A New Draft

If corporations are people...*
i.e. I diverge:  The Gum Ball Theory?
KP PK

Regarding the prism** of history. ***


On the left we have the good cop. On the right we have the bad cop.
Too bad cops(or filibusters), aren't in the constitution, but they are metaphors for elements of progress.  ^  [There are three equal branches of government. On the left we have the Republican executive, on the right we have the Democratic leader.]
   

*pre-emptive syncratic process
The Divergence of Hardball
** compliments to and complement to David Gregory [11-26-13 Roger Simon]
^  OW  (Ted Cruz' Glass House) see Hardball.
Re:image- on the right the unified executive, on the left the constitutional O~B^^won.
[Bush/Cruz/Walker/Rubio? The pure pol?] ABC (anacronistically blogging culture)
^^ Remitt-flop (i.e. Congressional infinitive)
FP All In. Fear of Process.
Chris Hayes No chyron? This is what Democracy looks like.  Too diluted.
*** the big hint

, comma added , also Roger Simon link
[fair and balanced ? ]
The two Manicheans?

Con Fluence...

of Terror ? 

... not to make light or tangent, nor preempt.***

Yesterday another "tragedy" has struck a major city and our nation.  The "quotation marks" only designate* the issue with words.  As a runner with relatives in Boston, not that I will ever run a marathon, the relation to this matter is special.
]segue see list below[

No one has taken credit yet, or at least those that may have are being withheld or dismissed by authorities. That seems an added layer of terror, not to lay blame or further speculation.
]post asterisks[

The point is that yesterday was a day of confluence, with  relation to North Korea's "leadership", Boston's History, a Newtown dedication, and our Nation's debtedness.




Links(FP1) list:**
Wiki/Fluence, Nuke Korea?, (as the POTUS is now defining terrorism), Boston Photo, round file, not+to+make+light(b.s.) / link, (light), hume+or+us, tan+gent, unified+executive, not+fully+read+yet.

*embed search "ism" (i.e. Google)
**for the scroll-over challenged or to save a click, links in order of appearance
*** if only terror could be preempted

[Not an endorsement of any links, let alone violence. But a cautionary tail of politics ?]
[Update: actually Read!]
[Update: 4-25-13 NoBell Tag ?]

Hope? Under Cover of Denial.

"they could try to stop me"
To Congress "Bring Em On!"
This is another one of my preemptive reads, [First Read] ...(not even clicked on) where I am giving my take based on a glance at the headlines and little more than what Air America Radio or the local paper provide. Which is probably a bit more than Bush reads, but he does say that they(the media) are a filter and I am sure he filters much of what he gets from his "objective staff". The second hope (the first being "they" do) is that there will be more diplomatic results:
Rice to attend Israeli, Palestinian summit
Secretary of state hears demand for stronger U.S. push on Mideast peace

But as I must go back, as I promised, to add links connecting previous takes, I will go straight to the point. Is the president attempting to implement all the suggestions of the IRSG under cover of denial for political gain? Or is he attempting to implement an Iran strategy under cover of politics for the security of the country? Denial of politics is not what I am talking about here in that politics must play a part, but the part that must be focused on is the goal and that and it's parts are still cloudy.

Diplomacy under the cloud of offensive measures, even under cover of defensive needs, is no excuse for not uncovering what our goal really is. Actions speak louder than words, but words must begin to be trusted, then verified by both sides, whether between nations or branches of government. The "unified executive" here and the "unity government" of Iraq, must be scrutinized, especially under the light of the cloud they like to place over the United Nations and international "law".